Tag Archives: legal proceedings

Supreme Court Backs Pune’s ‘Burger King’ Amid Trademark Clash. Read more:

The Indian culinary landscape recently witnessed a significant legal battle between a local Pune-based restaurant and the international fast-food giant, Burger King Corporation. At the heart of the dispute lies the use of the “Burger King” trademark, with both entities asserting rights over the name. The Supreme Court’s recent intervention has provided temporary relief to the local establishment, allowing it to operate under the contested name pending a final decision.

Background of the Dispute of Burger King

Burger King Corporation, established in 1954, is renowned globally as one of the largest fast-food hamburger chains. The company officially entered the Indian market in 2014. However, a Pune-based restaurant has been operating under the “Burger King” name since 2008, predating the corporation’s Indian debut. This overlap led the U.S. company to file a trademark infringement lawsuit in 2011, seeking to prevent the local eatery from using the “Burger King” name and claiming damages of ₹20 lakhs.

Legal Proceedings and Judgments

In July 2024, a Pune district court ruled in favor of the local restaurant, recognizing it as a “prior and honest user” of the “Burger King” trademark. The court noted that the Pune establishment had been operating since the early 1990s, whereas Burger King Corporation registered its trademark for restaurant services in India only in 2006. Dissatisfied with this outcome, the U.S. company appealed to the Bombay High Court, which subsequently issued an order restraining the Pune eatery from using the “Burger King” name.

Supreme Court’s Intervention

Challenging the Bombay High Court’s decision, the proprietors of the Pune restaurant approached the Supreme Court. A bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma granted interim relief by staying the High Court’s order. This stay permits the Pune-based “Burger King” to continue its operations under the disputed name until the High Court delivers its final judgment. The Supreme Court clarified that the Bombay High Court is free to proceed with hearing the appeal on its merits.

Implications of the Ruling

The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the importance of prior use in trademark disputes within the Indian legal framework. By granting interim relief to the local eatery, the court acknowledged the potential hardships faced by small businesses when challenged by multinational corporations. This case highlights the delicate balance courts must maintain between protecting established trademarks and recognizing the rights of prior users, especially when they are smaller entities operating in local markets.

Conclusion

The ongoing trademark dispute between the Pune-based restaurant and Burger King Corporation serves as a pivotal case in understanding trademark laws in India. The Supreme Court’s interim relief to the local “Burger King” not only allows it to continue its operations but also sets a precedent for similar cases in the future. As the legal proceedings progress, the final outcome will be keenly observed by both legal experts and businesses, given its potential implications on trademark jurisprudence in the country.

Dont miss out:

Why Starbucks Faces Profitability Challenges in India. Read More:

Government Demands ₹24,500 Crore from Reliance – What’s Next?

In a significant development, the Indian government has issued a demand notice of $2.81 billion (approximately ₹24,500 crore) to Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) and its partners, BP Plc and NIKO (NECO) Ltd. This demand pertains to the alleged extraction and sale of natural gas that migrated from Oil and Natural Gas Corporation’s (ONGC) blocks to RIL’s KG-D6 field in the Krishna Godavari basin.

Background of the Reliance Dispute

The dispute dates back to 2013 when ONGC suspected that natural gas from its KG-DWN-98/2 (KG-D5) and G-4 blocks was migrating into RIL’s adjacent KG-D6 field. ONGC claimed that at least four wells drilled by RIL near the boundary were extracting its resources. In May 2013, ONGC filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court seeking compensation for the alleged loss.

Arbitration and Legal Proceedings

Following the court’s direction, an independent panel investigated the claims, leading the government in 2016 to demand $1.55 billion from RIL and its partners for the alleged gas migration. RIL contested this claim before an arbitral tribunal, which, in July 2018, ruled in favor of the company, stating it was not liable for any compensation. The government challenged this arbitration ruling in the Delhi High Court, arguing that it contradicted public policy and favored the contractor unjustly. In May 2023, a single-judge bench upheld the arbitration award, dismissing the government’s appeal. However, in February 2025, a division bench of the Delhi High Court overturned the previous judgment, ruling against RIL and its partners.

Current Demand Notice

Consequent to the division bench’s judgment, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas issued a demand notice of $2.81 billion to RIL and its partners. This amount includes compensation for the gas allegedly extracted from ONGC’s reserves, additional profit petroleum due to disallowed costs after KG-D6’s output fell below target, and interest calculated at LIBOR plus 2 percent.

Reliance’s Response

RIL has received the demand notice and, based on legal advice, considers the division bench’s judgment and the provisional demand unsustainable. The company plans to challenge the judgment in the Supreme Court and does not anticipate any liability arising from this case.

Conclusion

The ongoing legal battle between the Indian government and RIL over the alleged gas migration underscores the complexities involved in resource extraction and ownership. As the case progresses to the Supreme Court, its outcome will have significant implications for the involved parties and the broader energy sector in India.

Also Read:

Jio Hotstar Faces Backlash Over Performance and Content Issues